Weak Tie Revolts More Vulnerable?

Malcolm Gladwell’s piece in the New York Times calls into the questions the tools like Twitter for modern day activism.  Moldova’s revolution happened with very few people even owning Twitter accounts. There was no twitter revolution in Iran.

To dig deeper into this claim, he references the 1960 sit-ins and nonviolent protests of young black people defying societal norms of where they could be served at the Greensboro lunch counter. The common thread with all of these protests and revolutions is that high-risk activism is a “strong-tie” phenomenon. Within these groups, it was found that the informal ties mattered. One study of the Red Brigades, the Italian terrorist group, found that 70% of the members already had a close friend involved.

So it boils back down to our interactions, our connections. Some tools manage what we already have in terms of connections. Social media tools also let us scale up the bridging and bonding ties, enlarging our reach and reducing barriers to participation.

So is Twitter helping to enable weak-tie activism? And is weak-tie activism as effective? After all, the bonds and redundancies in these networks would not be as strong.  Perhaps then this is why you have such a range of people for protests such as the student protests- those at the highest level of political reform and those who just want to break some **it. It would stand to reason then that our new age of activism, although more widespread, may not be as cohesive and bonded, and easier to dissolve.

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell#ixzz1us6RHC2a

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Weak Tie Revolts More Vulnerable?

  1. deliuk says:

    enjoyed reading … great insights & questions to consider … Carolyn, you have a wonderful mind 🙂

  2. carolynfreed says:

    Thanks Dianne- right backatcha

  3. Sylvia says:

    Want to ‘Like’ Dianne’s comment. It is spot on.

    I think Twitter is enabling weak-tie activism. It allows people of different social circles to be exposed to more things, and there are more people boldly voicing their opinions about what they support (whether it is social issues, charities, etc.). But you also touch on a great point on the fickleness of it as well – the support can be fleeting… a support ribbon one day, gone the next.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: